Saturday, October 23, 2010

Golding takes us for Idiots



In August 2009 Bruce Golding, assuming the
people of Jamaica were stupider than he was,
began his mendacious plot designed to protect
not just Chris Coke, but to protect himself.

If his project was simply to prevent the
extradition of Chris Coke to the United
States, to stand trial for drug charges,
there were myriad ways he could have ensured
Coke's safety.

The easiest was having him quietly transported
from Jamaica to Brasil where once ensconced,
the police could be activated, and finding no
Coke, Golding would be able to honestly tell
the United States, he is not here.

Reports from Coke could be circulated that he
wanted to watch the 2010 World Cup from Brasil
and had gone down extra early to set himself
up comfortably.

Even though the United States learned Golding
was corrupt before the majority of Jamaicans,
(which is why they leaked the extradition request
to the Commissioner of Police, who has integrity)
they could never prove Golding told Coke to disappear.

Golding could put on his patented 'innocent' face
and lie. No one could prove that Coke had been
forewarned, so the matter would float away.

But Golding, thinking Jamaicans were stupider than
he is, began the process of stripping naked on the
wrong side of one way glass.

Golding, poor thing, never knew that any American
citizen who works for a foreign government must declare it.

Manatt, thinking it had been legitimately hired by
the Jamaican government, proceeded to act.

Why should it not think it was hired by a 'political
party' as Golding tells it, (now that he tells it, but
he never told it between August '09 and May '10)? as
no less than the Solicitor General and a member of
Government in the meetings.

That the money was 'washed' through Harold Brady's Account
is not that shocking. After all, Brady is a lawyer and
lawyers disperse funds on behalf of their clients.

Of course, the fact Golding lied about receiving the
Extradition request, lied about hiring Manatt, probably
lies about what he eats for breakfast is to be forgotten.

Forgotten in the blood of Tivoli, forgotten in his war
against the higglers, many of who live in Tivoli, forgotten
in his establishment of a Commission to Inquire into the
events surrounding the hiring of Manatt.

Like Oscar Wilde, Golding is building the case against
himself.

There must be questions asked of Manatt, questions of the
solicitor general, of Brady, and the ex-Commish of Police.

What Golding wisely ceased, was his threat to sue the ABC
news network, which leaked the fact the Grand Jury of
New York, which indicted Coke, listed him as a Criminal
Associate.

The Prime Minister of Jamaica is a Criminal Associate of
Chris Coke.

Oh how Bruce must of wished the Police killed Coke.



2 comments:

  1. 1. The request got to the media between being "leaked" to the commissioner and being sent to the Government. Since the Commissioner has integrity, (as you claim) are we to assume that America violated the part of the treaty that requires confidentiality?

    2. Read the ABC peace again. It is carefully worded, so that a libel case cannot stand, even if there is no evidence to back up the claim in the story. American Libel law protects media a lot better than Jamaican libel law.

    3. How many Comrades were named on this Commission?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is January 2011. The facts are;

    1. The Comish realised Golding would hide the request so after a time, leaked it. Hence, he
    lost the job. But why should he assist in a cover-up when even a simpleton would know that Manatt would have to publish the fact it was working for the Jamaican GOVERNMENT.

    1.a. If the US Gov. realising that Golding was going to find every possible way to not-comply and bring the entire country into derision, why not leak it?

    1.b. The recent Wikileaks proved that Golding was trying every way possible to avoid extradition, from having his Wife meet with US officials, to the Mayor of Kingston begging the US not to go through with it.

    2. The Grand Jury sat in NYC. It didn't know Golding from Pindling. It examined evidence and came to its ruling.

    2.a. The reason why Golding can not sue ABC is two fold. Firstly, they reported the truth; the findings of the Grand Jury.

    2.b. Golding would lose for he is and was a criminal associate of Coke.

    Truth is a complete defense.

    ReplyDelete